▶ Watch this sermon on YouTube (Ligonier Ministries)
Israel’s Rejection Not Total (Romans 11:1–10) by R.C. Sproul. © Ligonier Ministries 2025. Used by permission of Ligonier Ministries. All rights reserved.
The sermon above is from another teacher. StoryReserve's own channel is youtube.com/@storyreserve.
Romans 11 is Paul’s most complete teaching on the future of ethnic Israel, and how you read it shapes your whole eschatology — pre-, post-, a-, and pan-millennialism all turn on this chapter. Sproul approaches it with ‘fear and trepidation’ because there are genuinely difficult problems here. This is not a text to handle glibly.
Paul’s rhetorical question: has God cast away His people? His answer is emphatic — ‘May it never be!’ And his proof is startling: he argues from the lesser to the greater and chooses as exhibit A the least likely candidate, himself. ‘I also am an Israelite, of the tribe of Benjamin.’ If God had cast off all the Jews, He would have cast off Paul — the one writing the letter.
In the worst apostasy of Israel’s history — Ahab and Jezebel, altars torn down, prophets killed — Elijah cried out, ‘I alone am left.’ Sproul names this the Elijah syndrome: the despair true believers feel when surrounded by apostasy. And his definition cuts: apostasy is not paganism. It can only happen *inside* the house of God, when people repudiate a faith they once professed. Whole churches and denominations can become apostate — Sproul names the one that ordained him.
God’s answer to Elijah was not sympathy but fact: ‘I have reserved for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.’ Elijah’s count was wrong — he simply could not see them. Paul draws the line straight to his own day: ‘even so then, at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.’ God always has His people, even when His prophet can see none of them.
Two thousand years of Diaspora, and the Jews never lost their ethnic and national identity. Sproul contrasts his own Irish roots: he knows the story, he heard the lullabies — but he does not dream of ‘next year in Dublin.’ He has been assimilated. Israel has not. ‘Next year in Jerusalem’ has been prayed for two millennia. That stubborn persistence is itself a standing witness to God’s providential government of redemptive history.
‘If by grace, then it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace.’ This is the hinge of the passage. A remnant chosen by grace excludes any contribution of works — not because works are worthless, but because a grace that required your works would no longer *be* grace. The two are mutually exclusive by definition. You cannot have both.
The solemn other side, and the text will not let us soften it: ‘the elect have obtained it, and the rest were hardened.’ Isaiah’s ‘spirit of stupor,’ David’s ‘let their table become a snare.’ Those who would not come are given over to the blindness they chose. Paul does not explain this away — he quotes it and lets it stand.